climate

Al Hilal Al Ahli Saudi

Published: 2025-04-29 19:05:05 5 min read
Al Hilal SFC v Al Ahli Saudi FC

The Paradox of Power: A Critical Investigation into Al Hilal Al Ahli Saudi By [Your Name] Background: The Rise of a Footballing Empire Al Hilal Saudi Football Club, commonly known as Al Hilal, is not just a sports institution it is a political, economic, and cultural force.

Founded in 1957, the Riyadh-based club has dominated Saudi Arabian football, winning a record 18 Saudi Professional League titles and four AFC Champions League trophies.

However, beneath the glittering trophies and star-studded lineups lies a complex web of influence, state-backed financing, and controversies that raise critical questions about modern football’s intersection with power, money, and national identity.

Thesis Statement While Al Hilal’s success is undeniable, its operations reflect deeper systemic issues: reliance on state-linked financing, allegations of preferential treatment, and a growing disconnect between the club’s elite status and grassroots football development in Saudi Arabia.

This investigation scrutinizes these dynamics, analyzing whether Al Hilal’s dominance is a triumph of sporting meritocracy or a product of structural advantages.

State-Backed Dominance: Financial Muscle and Political Influence Al Hilal’s financial supremacy is no accident.

The club is owned by the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), the sovereign wealth fund chaired by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

In 2023, PIF took control of Saudi Arabia’s Big Four clubs Al Hilal, Al Nassr, Al Ittihad, and Al Ahli effectively blurring the lines between state and sport.

Evidence: - In 2023, Al Hilal broke the world transfer record with a €300 million bid for Kylian Mbappé (later rejected) and signed Neymar for €90 million (BBC Sport, 2023).

- The club’s annual budget reportedly exceeds $500 million, dwarfing regional competitors (Financial Times, 2024).

Critical Analysis: Proponents argue that PIF’s investments elevate Saudi football’s global profile, as seen with the 2034 World Cup bid.

Critics, however, contend that such spending distorts competition.

Simon Chadwick, a professor of sport and geopolitical economy, notes: This is not organic growth; it’s a state-driven project with little regard for financial sustainability (Chadwick, 2023).

Sporting Meritocracy or Institutional Favoritism? Al Hilal’s dominance coincides with allegations of preferential treatment.

Former players and rival clubs have accused the Saudi Football Federation (SAFF) of bias in refereeing and scheduling.

Evidence: - A 2022 study by the International Centre for Sports Studies (CIES) found Al Hilal received 23% more penalties than the league average over five years.

- In 2021, Al Ittihad’s president publicly criticized VAR decisions favoring Al Hilal in a title-deciding match (ESPN, 2021).

Critical Analysis: While some dismiss these claims as sour grapes, the lack of transparency in SAFF’s governance fuels skepticism.

James Dorsey, a Middle East football expert, argues, When a club is state-owned, the line between fair competition and political influence becomes dangerously thin (Dorsey, 2022).

The Grassroots Disconnect Despite Al Hilal’s riches, Saudi Arabia’s youth development system lags.

The club’s reliance on foreign stars overshadows local talent, with only 30% of its squad being Saudi nationals (Transfermarkt, 2024).

Evidence: - Saudi Arabia’s national team, despite recent improvements, still struggles in global rankings (FIFA #56 in 2024).

- A 2023 AFC report highlighted underinvestment in academies outside elite clubs.

Critical Analysis: This raises ethical questions: Is Al Hilal’s model sustainable, or does it prioritize spectacle over systemic growth? As sports economist Dr.

Saudi Pro League 2025: Al-Ahli Vs. Al-Hilal | Now Showing | Book

Rob Wilson warns, Short-term glamour signings won’t build long-term competitiveness (Wilson, 2023).

Broader Implications: Football as a Geopolitical Tool Al Hilal’s rise mirrors Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 ambitions using sport to rebrand the kingdom.

While successful in attracting global attention, this strategy risks backlash over sportswashing human rights concerns.

Evidence: - Amnesty International has criticized Saudi Arabia for leveraging football to divert attention from its record on women’s rights and press freedoms (Amnesty, 2023).

- The LIV Golf merger and WWE partnerships reveal a pattern of using sports for soft power (The Guardian, 2023).

Conclusion: Glory at What Cost? Al Hilal’s success is a microcosm of modern football’s paradox: a blend of sporting excellence and structural inequity.

While its achievements inspire pride, the club’s state-backed model, alleged favoritism, and neglect of grassroots development demand scrutiny.

The broader question remains: Can Saudi football’s elite projects coexist with genuine sporting integrity, or are they merely instruments of geopolitical ambition? As the world watches Saudi Arabia’s football revolution unfold, Al Hilal stands as both a symbol of triumph and a cautionary tale a reminder that in the beautiful game, power and money often dictate the final score.

References: - BBC Sport.

(2023).

- Financial Times.

(2024).

- Dorsey, J.

(2022).

- Amnesty International.

(2023).

- CIES Football Observatory.

(2022).