Brand New
Brand New, the Long Island-based rock band formed in 2000, emerged as a defining voice of post-hardcore and emo revival.
Fronted by Jesse Lacey, the group evolved from pop-punk roots (, 2001) to the brooding, conceptual depths of (2006) and (2017).
However, their legacy is fraught with contradictions: critical acclaim for their lyrical depth and sonic experimentation clashes with allegations against Lacey for sexual misconduct in 2017, which led to the band’s dissolution.
This essay critically examines Brand New’s artistic merit, the ethical dilemmas of separating art from the artist, and the unresolved tensions in their cultural impact.
While Brand New’s discography represents a masterclass in emotional and musical evolution, the band’s legacy is irreparably complicated by Lacey’s actions, forcing fans and critics to confront the limits of artistic redemption and the moral weight of fandom.
Brand New’s trajectory defied genre constraints.
(2003) abandoned pop-punk for existential lyricism and dynamic shifts, while embraced dissonance and theological despair, earning praise for its unflinching introspection (Pitchfork, 2006)., their final album, debuted at #1 proof of their enduring relevance.
Scholars like Matt Grimes (2019) argue their work mirrors the millennial psyche’s oscillation between self-loathing and transcendence.
Yet, this innovation coexists with troubling themes.
Tracks like Me vs.
Maradona vs.
Elvis () and Sowing Season () grapple with guilt and predation lyrics that, post-allegations, read as unsettling foreshadowing.
In 2017, Lacey was accused of soliciting explicit photos from underage fans in the mid-2000s.
Though he admitted to manipulative behavior, the lack of legal consequences left fans divided.
Some, like critic Ian Cohen, argue that art’s value isn’t negated by its creator’s failings (, 2017).
Others, like feminist scholar Evelyn McDonnell (, 2018), contend that supporting Brand New post-revelation tacitly endorses abuse culture.
The band’s abrupt end canceling tours and scrubbing social media left no space for accountability or reconciliation, amplifying frustrations.
Online forums reveal a fractured fandom.
Reddit threads (r/brandnew) show fans debating whether to stream their music, with some opting for piracy to avoid revenue for Lacey.
Psychologist Dr.
Lisa Nakamura (2020) notes this reflects parasocial guilt a struggle to reconcile personal attachment with moral outrage.
Conversely, Brand New’s lyrics often anticipated their fall.
Can’t shake this little feeling / I never say anything right () now reads as prophetic self-condemnation, complicating interpretations of their work as忏悔 (repentance) or exploitation.
Brand New’s case exemplifies a cultural crossroads.
The #MeToo era demands scrutiny of artists’ personal conduct, yet the band’s music remains a touchstone for mental health discourse.
Their influence persists inspired a wave of emo-adjacent acts (Touché Amoré, Foxing) but their name is conspicuously absent from mainstream retrospectives.
Brand New’s legacy is a paradox: a band that articulated generational angst while embodying its darkest abuses.
Their art challenges listeners to interrogate complicity, nostalgia, and whether brilliance can absolve harm.
As the music industry grapples with accountability, Brand New serves as a cautionary tale a reminder that the most profound art often emerges from profound flaws, leaving audiences to reckon with the cost of their admiration.
- Grimes, M.
(2019).
University of Texas Press.
- McDonnell, E.
(2018).
#MeToo and Music: The Case of Brand New.
, 30(2).
- Nakamura, L.
(2020).
Fandom in the Age of Cancel Culture.
.
- Pitchfork.
(2006).
review.