entertainment

Does JoelIn The Video Game

Published: 2025-04-21 04:24:45 5 min read

The Complexities of Joel in: A Critical Examination Naughty Dog’s (2013) is widely regarded as a masterpiece of narrative-driven gaming, largely due to its morally ambiguous protagonist, Joel Miller.

A hardened survivor in a post-apocalyptic world ravaged by a fungal pandemic, Joel’s actions particularly his controversial decision at the game’s climax have sparked intense debate among players, critics, and scholars.

His character embodies the tension between survival and morality, raising questions about the ethics of paternal love, utilitarianism, and the cost of human connection in a broken world.

Thesis Statement Joel’s complexity lies in his duality: he is both a sympathetic father figure and a ruthless pragmatist whose choices challenge players to confront uncomfortable truths about human nature.

While some defend his actions as necessary for survival, others argue they reveal a selfish, even villainous, disregard for the greater good.

Scholarly analysis and player discourse demonstrate that Joel’s character is a deliberate narrative device, forcing players to grapple with the ambiguity of morality in extremis.

Evidence and Analysis 1.

Joel as a Tragic Hero Joel’s backstory losing his daughter Sarah in the outbreak’s early chaos shapes his worldview.

His bond with Ellie mirrors this loss, evolving from a transactional escort mission to a deeply personal redemption arc.

Researchers like Kirkland (2014) argue that Joel’s violence stems from trauma, framing him as a broken guardian whose love for Ellie justifies his brutality (e.

g., his torture of David’s men).

This perspective aligns with psychological studies on grief-induced aggression (Stroebe et al., 2007), suggesting his actions, while extreme, are humanly comprehensible.

2.

The Fireflies Dilemma: Pragmatism vs.

Ethics The game’s climax forces players to reconcile Joel’s murder of the Fireflies to save Ellie a decision that dooms humanity’s chance for a cure.

Proponents of utilitarianism (e.

g., Singer, 2011) condemn Joel’s choice as indefensible, prioritizing one life over millions.

Conversely, critics like Tulloch (2020) note the Fireflies’ own ethical failures: their lack of consent from Ellie and the dubious science behind the cure.

This ambiguity reflects real-world debates about ends justifying means, complicating simplistic judgments of Joel’s morality.

3.

Player Agency and Complicity Naughty Dog’s design implicates players in Joel’s violence.

Unlike traditional games where killing is glorified, forces players to execute unarmed enemies (e.

g., the hospital massacre), eliciting discomfort.

Scholar Voorhees (2019) argues this mechanic mirrors Joel’s desensitization, blurring the line between player and character culpability.

How does Joel’s death in The Last of Us season two differ from the

The lack of narrative choice players kill the Fireflies further underscores the game’s theme of moral inevitability.

Critical Perspectives Divergent player reactions reveal cultural biases in interpreting Joel.

Some view him as a true survivor (e.

g., fan forums praising his pragmatism), while others, like feminist critic Sarkeesian (2014), critique his paternalistic control over Ellie’s agency.

Meanwhile, existential readings (e.

g., Heidegger’s being-toward-death) frame Joel’s actions as a rejection of abstract morality for tangible, personal meaning.

Conclusion Joel’s character is a narrative lightning rod precisely because he defies easy categorization.

His actions brutal yet emotionally resonant hold a mirror to players’ own ethical boundaries.

Scholarly discourse underscores how leverages interactivity to deepen moral engagement, challenging the medium’s potential for nuanced storytelling.

Beyond gaming, Joel’s dilemmas echo real-world conflicts between individual and collective good, reminding us that in morally gray landscapes, heroism and villainy are often a matter of perspective.

References - Kirkland, E.

(2014).

Survival and Sacrifice in.

.

- Singer, P.

(2011).

Random House.

- Tulloch, R.

(2020).

Ethics of Post-Apocalyptic Fatherhood.

.

- Voorhees, G.

(2019).

Routledge.