Saints 2013 Draft Picks: Results, Analysis And Grades
The Saints' 2013 Draft: A Case Study in Risk, Reward, and Front Office Foresight (or Lack Thereof) The 2013 NFL Draft looms large in the annals of New Orleans Saints history, not for its resounding success, but for the perplexing mix of shrewd picks and baffling misses it unveiled.
Arriving just two years after Bountygate, a scandal that rocked the organization to its core, the Saints entered the draft under intense scrutiny, needing to rebuild depth while navigating the lingering fallout of the scandal.
This investigation aims to critically analyze the results of the Saints' 2013 draft, examining the individual picks, their performance against expectations, and the larger implications for the team's long-term trajectory.
Our thesis: the Saints' 2013 draft represents a microcosm of the inherent risks in NFL drafting, revealing a flawed strategy that prioritized short-term needs over sustainable long-term growth, ultimately hindering the franchise's potential.
The Saints held the 15th overall pick, a position that, in theory, should yield a high-impact player.
They selected Kenny Vaccaro, a versatile safety from Texas.
While Vaccaro displayed flashes of brilliance and became a reliable starter, he never quite lived up to the expectations of a first-round pick.
His production, while consistent, lacked the game-changing impact often associated with top-15 selections.
This suggests a possible misjudgment of Vaccaro's potential or an overemphasis on filling an immediate need at safety, perhaps neglecting players with higher ceilings at other positions.
The second-round pick, Terron Armstead, represents a stark contrast.
Considered a raw but exceptionally athletic offensive tackle, Armstead defied expectations, developing into a Pro Bowler and cornerstone of the Saints' offensive line.
This pick exemplifies the value of identifying talent with high upside, even if it entails significant developmental risk.
Armstead’s success highlights the Saints' scouting department's capability to unearth hidden gems, albeit inconsistently.
Further down the draft, the choices become increasingly questionable.
The Saints selected several players who failed to make significant contributions, highlighting a lack of consistent evaluation and player selection strategy.
This lack of consistent success in later rounds suggests a deficiency in the team’s ability to identify value and project talent beyond the first couple of rounds, a common failing in many NFL organizations.
(See: Thornton, A.
(2017).
.
Journal of Sports Analytics, 3(2), 123-145.
) The absence of a clear, long-term vision is palpable in this draft class.
While the team addressed immediate needs, they seemingly failed to invest sufficiently in building a sustainable roster foundation.
The draft lacked a coherent strategy; it wasn't clear whether the front office prioritized building through the trenches, bolstering offensive weaponry, or shoring up the defense.
This lack of a defined roadmap for roster construction is a serious deficiency and likely contributed to the inconsistent performance of the draft class as a whole.
Alternative perspectives exist.
Some argue that the Saints were hamstrung by the lingering effects of Bountygate, limiting their access to top-tier talent and impacting their scouting efforts.
This explanation, while partially valid, does not fully account for the questionable decisions made later in the draft.
Furthermore, other teams facing similar challenges have demonstrated a greater ability to navigate those difficulties and achieve greater draft success.
Another perspective centers on the inherent unpredictability of the NFL draft.
Many factors beyond the control of the front office, such as player development, injuries, and coaching changes, influence the ultimate success or failure of draft picks.
While acknowledging this inherent uncertainty, the significant disparity in the performance of the Saints' 2013 draft selections, particularly the stark contrast between Armstead and other picks, raises concerns about their evaluation process and overall drafting strategy.
In conclusion, the Saints' 2013 draft offers a valuable case study in the complexities of talent acquisition in the NFL.
While the selection of Terron Armstead proved to be a stroke of genius, the overall results, particularly the underwhelming performance of several other picks, highlight significant shortcomings in the Saints’ draft strategy and talent evaluation process.
The lack of a clear, long-term vision and the seemingly inconsistent approach to player selection contributed to a draft class that ultimately fell short of expectations, hindering the team's long-term growth and demonstrating the high-stakes gamble inherent in this crucial element of team building.
Future investigations should focus on analyzing the evolution of the Saints' drafting strategy post-2013 to assess whether lessons were learned from these past mistakes.
The team's subsequent draft success (or failure) could provide crucial insight into the effectiveness of organizational learning and adaptation in the fiercely competitive NFL landscape.