news

Wisconsin Race

Published: 2025-04-02 02:08:18 5 min read
How a Wisconsin Supreme Court race could influence abortion laws - The

Wisconsin has long been a pivotal battleground in U.

S.

elections, with its razor-thin margins and deeply polarized electorate shaping national outcomes.

Since the 2016 presidential election, where Donald Trump won by just 22,748 votes, Wisconsin’s political landscape has been scrutinized for its demographic shifts, voter suppression allegations, and the outsized influence of rural versus urban voting blocs.

The state’s electoral dynamics reflect broader national tensions over voting rights, gerrymandering, and the integrity of democratic processes.

The complexities of Wisconsin’s electoral system including partisan redistricting, voter ID laws, and urban-rural divides reveal systemic inequities that undermine democratic fairness, disproportionately disenfranchise marginalized communities, and amplify political polarization.

Wisconsin’s state legislative maps, redrawn by Republicans in 2011, have been among the most gerrymandered in the nation.

A 2022 study by the Brennan Center for Justice found that despite near-even statewide vote shares, Republicans secured 63 of 99 Assembly seats a clear distortion of democratic representation.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 2023 decision to overturn these maps underscored their unconstitutionality, yet the legacy of gerrymandering persists, entrenching GOP power while diluting urban and minority votes.

Wisconsin’s strict voter ID law, enacted in 2016, has disproportionately affected Black, Latino, and low-income voters.

A 2020 study by Priorities USA found that over 200,000 registered voters lacked the required ID, with Milwaukee home to Wisconsin’s largest Black population experiencing a 13% drop in turnout.

Proponents argue such laws prevent fraud, yet the Wisconsin Elections Commission reported only 27 potential cases of voter impersonation between 2004 and 2016, suggesting the policy’s rationale is politically motivated.

The divide between Milwaukee/Madison and rural counties has deepened.

In 2020, Biden won just 14 of Wisconsin’s 72 counties, yet his victories in Dane and Milwaukee counties secured the state by 20,682 votes.

Rural areas, fueled by conservative media and economic anxieties, have grown more Republican, while urban centers, driven by younger, diverse, and college-educated voters, lean Democratic.

This geographic polarization exacerbates distrust in election outcomes, as seen in post-2020 GOP-led audits and baseless fraud claims.

The COVID-19 pandemic intensified conflicts over mail-in voting.

In 2020, a record 1.

9 million Wisconsinites voted absentee, but GOP legislators later restricted drop boxes and sued to purge voter rolls.

While Democrats view these measures as voter suppression, Republicans cite election security, despite no evidence of widespread fraud.

Race, Diversity, and Ethnicity in Wisconsin | BestNeighborhood.org

The bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission, however, has consistently upheld the state’s elections as secure.

Supporters of Wisconsin’s GOP policies argue they ensure electoral integrity.

Conservative groups like the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty claim voter ID laws restore public confidence, though data shows they suppress turnout.

Conversely, civil rights organizations, such as the ACLU of Wisconsin, contend these laws target Democratic-leaning demographics.

Scholars like David Canon (UW-Madison) note that Wisconsin’s policies reflect a national Republican strategy to tilt elections via procedural barriers rather than policy appeal.

Wisconsin’s struggles mirror democratic crises nationwide: gerrymandering erodes accountability, voter laws deepen inequities, and polarization fuels instability.

The state’s 2024 elections featuring a pivotal Supreme Court race and another presidential showdown will test whether reforms can restore fairness or if partisan tactics will further distort democracy.

Wisconsin’s electoral system is a microcosm of America’s democratic tensions.

While its battleground status demands scrutiny, the state’s structural biases gerrymandering, voter suppression, and geographic divides reveal a democracy in peril.

Without nonpartisan redistricting, expanded voting access, and efforts to bridge polarization, Wisconsin risks becoming a case study in democratic backsliding rather than a model of electoral integrity.

The nation’s eyes remain fixed on the Badger State, not just for who wins, but for how democracy itself fares.

- Brennan Center for Justice (2022).

.

- Priorities USA (2020).

- Wisconsin Elections Commission (2016).

- Canon, David (2021).

UW-Madison Press.

(Word count: ~4,800 characters).