Wrestlemania
The Spectacle and the Struggle: Unmasking the Complexities of WrestleMania Since its inception in 1985, WrestleMania has evolved from a niche wrestling event into a global cultural phenomenon, blending athleticism, storytelling, and corporate spectacle.
Dubbed the Super Bowl of Sports Entertainment, it generates millions in revenue, breaks attendance records, and captivates audiences worldwide.
Yet, beneath the glitz and pyro lies a labyrinth of contradictions exploitative labor practices, scripted narratives masquerading as competition, and the ethical dilemmas of an industry built on physical sacrifice.
This investigative essay argues that WrestleMania, while a masterclass in entertainment, perpetuates systemic issues within professional wrestling, from worker exploitation to the commodification of violence, all while maintaining a carefully crafted illusion of spontaneity.
The Illusion of Competition: Kayfabe and Corporate Control At the heart of WrestleMania’s appeal is the longstanding wrestling tradition of maintaining the illusion that scripted storylines are real.
While kayfabe has softened in the social media era, WWE’s tight control over narratives ensures fans remain emotionally invested in predetermined outcomes.
Scholar Sharon Mazer (1998) notes that wrestling’s power lies in its hyperreal nature, where audiences willingly suspend disbelief.
WrestleMania epitomizes this, with matches often serving as payoff to months of scripted rivalries.
However, this illusion comes at a cost.
Wrestlers, classified as independent contractors, lack union representation and health benefits despite performing high-risk stunts.
The 2020 documentary revealed how WWE’s contractual control extends to wrestlers’ outside ventures, stifling their autonomy.
Former WWE star Jon Moxley (f.
k.
a.
Dean Ambrose) publicly criticized the company’s restrictive creative process, calling it suffocating (ESPN, 2019).
WrestleMania’s grandeur, then, is built on a foundation of labor exploitation masked by the spectacle.
The Physical Toll: Glorifying Violence Without Accountability WrestleMania’s most iconic moments often involve jaw-dropping stunts The Undertaker’s Hell in a Cell fall in 1998, Shane McMahon’s leap off the WrestleMania 32 set but these feats obscure the brutal reality of wrestling’s physical toll.
A 2020 study found that wrestlers suffer injury rates comparable to combat sports, with long-term effects like CTE (Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy) often overlooked.
WWE’s wellness policy, instituted after the 2007 Chris Benoit tragedy, has been criticized for its lack of transparency.
Wrestler CM Punk alleged in a 2014 podcast that WWE’s medical staff misdiagnosed a staph infection, nearly costing him his life.
Yet, WrestleMania’s marketing continues to glorify risk, with no mention of the healthcare gaps faced by performers.
The Gender Paradox: Progress Amid Exploitation WrestleMania has mirrored WWE’s uneven gender evolution.
The 2018 women’s main event a first for WrestleMania was hailed as a milestone, yet female wrestlers still grapple with pay disparities and sexualized portrayals.
Former wrestler Ashley Massaro’s affidavit (2019) alleged WWE pressured her not to report a sexual assault during a military tour, a claim WWE denies.
While the Women’s Evolution brought legitimacy, it coexists with a history of exploitation, as detailed in by David Shoemaker.
The Fan Paradox: Complicity in the Spectacle WrestleMania’s success relies on fan engagement, yet audiences often overlook the industry’s darker aspects.
Economists note WWE’s monopoly power (Forbes, 2021) in wrestling, allowing it to dictate terms to both wrestlers and fans.
The rise of AEW (All Elite Wrestling) has introduced competition, but WrestleMania remains the pinnacle, its flaws overshadowed by nostalgia and fandom.
Conclusion: The Cost of the Spectacle WrestleMania is a paradox a dazzling showcase of athleticism and storytelling built on systemic exploitation.
While it provides livelihoods and entertainment, its corporate machinery prioritizes profit over performer welfare.
The broader implications extend beyond wrestling, reflecting tensions in entertainment labor, gender equity, and consumer complicity.
As fans cheer the next WrestleMania moment, they must ask: at what cost does the spectacle come? Sources Cited: - Mazer, S.
(1998).
.
- ESPN (2019).
Jon Moxley interview.
- (2020).
Vice TV.
- Shoemaker, D.
(2013).
- Forbes (2021).
WWE’s Monopoly Problem.
.